|
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGE NAVIGATION
|
FILM REVIEWS *NOTE: This page is in it's infancy, so bare with us cos there aint much here yet |
||||||||||||
| 1,2,3,4 | |||||||||||||
1234 is a tale of young love disguised as a film about a young indie band dreaming of making it big – but it might possibly be the other way around. Bespectacled guitarist Stevie (Ian Bonar) together with his mate Neil (Matthew Baynton) attempt to break out of the hum drum existence of working in a call centre by forming a band. First they recruit the slightly older and more experienced Billy (Kieran Bew) and slightly scatty bassist Emily (Lyndsey Marshal) - who moonlights as an artist, making sculptures out of hair and creating maps based on a day following strangers around. The band rehearse in what appears to be a church hall, play gigs in pubs, lay down a demo and send it off to every record company they can think of – then build up a collection of rejection letters from said record companies. The film is not a Guy Ritchie movie, not a Huw Grant Movie and not even a Billy Elliot move; it is a tale of people having a laugh and making the most of things while living a mundane life but living in hope. There is no happy ending, but at the end we do get a tantalising glimpse of light at the end of the tunnel, in more ways than one; you are left with a feeling that maybe things do work out but there is enough of a question mark at the end to generate a warm grin as the credits go up. This is a directorial debut by Giles Borg, who cut his teeth making music videos. The film was actually made back in 2008, with a little bit of help from the wallet of Radiohead’s Ed O’Brien, but is only now getting big screen space due to the New British Cinema Quarterly project. |
New British Cinema Quarterly | ||||||||||||
NBCQ is a scheme that is, in its own words, “Taking the most distinctive and original British feature films and filmmakers from the festival circuit and bringing them to the UK's flagship independent cinemas”. Chapter Arts in Cardiff, presumably, must be a ‘flagship independent cinema’, because this is where we headed to catch the first film to get the NBCQ treatment, 1234. As part of the NBCQ tours, films are followed by a question and answer session with someone connected with the film. In Cardiff we get the endearing Matthew Baynton, a young and refreshingly honest and down to earth character who gives us a little insight into how the film was made, tales of playing in his own band and a few thoughts on young love. All in all a thoroughly wholesome and heart warming evening.
|
|||||||||||||
| A Bit of Tom Jones | |||||||||||||
The basic plot of A Bit Of Tom Jones is based around the flims idea of a guy buying Tom Jones cock in a pub and spending the rest of the film trying to sell it to rich perverts that collect celebrity body parts. (Which is, of course, not unusual). It is a cross between Twin Town, Satellite City and a Carry On movie. On times the plot is - well - just plain silly, but there are a considerable number of scenes that produce all out belly laughs. Porn cinemas, brothels run by grannys in the middle of a valley terrace, police stations, helicopters and dumper trucks all some how fit into the story. Featuring everyone’s favourite dirty granny, Margaret John (Gavin and Stacy, High Hopes), Denise Welch (Waterloo Road, Coronation Street), Johnny Owen (Shameless and a fans view of the Cardiff City in the FA Cup) and the legendary Geno Washington, it is a reminder of how much talent is about in Wales at the moment. This low budget (£100,00) film made in Tredegar (South Wales) was originally only intended to be shown in Wales, but is now starting to get a handful of screenings of cinemas over the bridge. Funded by local businessmen and with only a handful of prints available, it has been outselling all other films in Merthyr Tydfil’s Vue cinema, including Michael Jackson and Michael Caine’s Harry Brown - and rightly so. This film is too good to be confined and sooner or later it is going to get the publicity it deserves.
|
|||||||||||||
Compiled from Swedish 16mm footage that had been lying undiscovered in the cellar of Swedish Television for 30 years, this film documents the US Black Power movement from 67 to 75. Broken neatly into a chapter for each year, it tells us chronologically of the struggle for civil rights in a society that claimed to be all for equality and freedom, but clearly was not. We get footage of Malcom X, Martin Luther King, Stokely Carmichael, Eldridge Cleaver, Bobby Seale, and Angela Davis, speaking from platforms, giving interviews and just hanging around; together with ‘ordinary’ black people discussing the struggle to just get by in ‘the land of freedom of opportunity’. The issue of violence v non violence is much discussed. Stokeley summing it up with an early statement, “Dr King’s policy was that if you suffer your opponent will see your suffering and will be moved to change his heart. That is very good. He only made one fallacious assumption. In order for non violence to work your opponent needs to have a conscience. The united States has none.” It is not all confrontation though and we see the Black Panther’s free breakfast programme which J. Edgar Hoover declared to be “The most dangerous internal threat to America”. The decline of Black Power seems to have been down to a CIA plot to turn every black man in Harlem into a junkie. At least according to this version of events. We have the bizarre spectacle of a tourist bus driving though Harlem telling the Swedish tourists that they should not set foot off the bus because even ‘good’ black people don’t wander into Harlem for fear of getting mugged. The publicity for the film refers to “The clear objective of introducing a new generation to the Black Power Movement”. Now this would be a tall order in ninety minutes and to be honest, if you don’t have some prior knowledge of the history, the film probably does not make a great deal of sense. There is a serious lack of context. The press also refers to “Utilizing an innovative format that riffs on the popular 70s mixtape format, the Black Power Mixtape is a cinematic and musical journey into the ghettos of America”. This sounds exciting but is a case of misrepresentation. It certainly does not ‘riff’ like anything and the music is quite frankly incidental. This negativity should not be taken as a condemnation of the film, it is interesting, enlightening and worth watching, it is just that it is not what the tin says it is. Anyone that turns up expecting a funky soundtrack and voiceovers by Danny Glover (he is a producer, name checking him in the publicity is unnecessary) will be sorely disappointed. A mix-tape this is not. If they actually publicised it as what it really is they might find they pull the right audience and they may well go away satisfied. As did we.
|
Directed by Göran Hugo Olsson.
Co-produced by Joslyn Barnes & Music By Questlove & Om'Mas Keith
Release Date: 21 October 2011 (UK)
|
||||||||||||
“Banksy is a sell out”. So reads the graffiti scrawled across the wall. Is this true? Well, he has certainly progressed from being an unknown street artist to an internationally renowned (all be it still anonymous) street artist that can put on sell out exhibitions, shift books by the shed load and – now – make his own films. Exit Through the Gift Shop is, on the face of it, a documentary made by Banksy about a guy that tried to make a film about Banksy but messed it up so Banksy made a film about him. There is no point getting too bogged down in the plot because to be honest, it is difficult to tell if it is a genuine documentary or if it is another one of Banksy’s magnificent pranks. Narrated by Rhys Ifans we are taken on a journey through underground street art with a host of graffiti artists, guerrilla stencil painters and pranksters. Whilst Banksy is the highlight of the film, it is clear he is not alone with numerous creative subversives making an appearance in this roller coaster ride that has you grinning, admiring, and on occasion down right laughing, for 87 minutes.
Whilst this is based in ‘underground’, DIY, street art; many of Banksy’s pranks are clearly not cheap. Some punk with a spray can he is not. We get telephone boxes bent in half, giant spray cans and exhibitions with live elephants painted like flock wall paper. Where the money for all this comes from is never explored. A trip to across the Atlantic to do a bit of graffiti is taken for granted, as if it is the most natural thing in the world. Most of his antics are clearly beyond the pockets of 99% of street artists, but does that really matter? His blend of satire, art, humour and subversion has simultaneously given the art establishment and street art a kick up the rear end. Art is supposed to be about originality, so we don’t want loads of copy cats, but if it inspires kids to do a bit more than just inane tags on bus stops and brightens up our streets then surely that is no bad thing. Fair play to him though, despite his global fame he appears to have stuck to his roots. His website declares: "Banksy does not endorse or profit from
the sale of greeting cards, mugs, tshirts,
photo canvases etc. Banksy is not on Facebook, Myspace, Twitter or Gaydar.
Banksy is not represented by any form What impact this thought provoking film will have on movie making is difficult to tell, but at the moment that is not important, all that matters is that it does what all good films should do, entertain, inspire and agitate. If you don’t leave the cinema after seeing this film eying up a bit of blank wall you have no soul. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||